data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/babc0/babc04021ded20f65a3e32fd6c23ea65a36164b9" alt=""
For many years I was disgusted and embarrassed that the
East Boston Times was my neighborhood weekly newspaper. It was poorly designed, badly written and filled with narrow-minded points of view. When the Independent Newspaper Group came along and purchased the
Times there was hope that the Revere-based company would improve the local rag. Alas, it was not to be.
The East Boston Times remains one of the worst examples of a weekly newspaper that I’ve ever seen. What qualifies me to make that statement? My word is certainly not the be-all and end-all, but I do know a little about this field. I have a degree in journalism, and I worked as a writer and editor for a company that owns eight weeklies in suburban Portland, Maine, where I won three first-place awards for stories I’d written. I attended newspaper conferences where we saw examples of papers from around the country. Let me tell you: None that I saw are as bad as the Times.
I also wrote a column for this outfit when they first came to this neighborhood with a paper known as the East Boston Independent. Personally they treated me well, and I was grateful that they made space for me each week. I wrote the column for one year. It didn’t take long for the Independent to buy out the East Boston Sun Transcript, which was an attractive and well-written paper, and from there they came after the Times and then sunk the operation down to the lowest common denominator.
Week after week the East Boston Times has little news and most of what they do publish is dull stuff about the procedures of local government and fluff pieces about how great the local politicians are. There are nearly 40,000 people in this neighborhood, and you mean to tell me that none of them are doing anything worth writing about? There are stories everywhere each and every day. However, no one at the Times is looking for them.
Last week one of the stories in the Times about the current campaign for state rep said this: “It doesn’t appear that issues mean very much in this special election.” Issues might not mean much to those at the Times, but they mean a great deal to quite a few voters. The Times has abdicated its civic duty by dedicating absolutely no space to a discussion of the issues and the candidates' positions on them. Shouldn’t that be the job of the local newspaper? My humble little blog has far outdone the weekly in a discussion of issues, as well as taking a look at who the candidates are.
The same piece in the Times offered this gem: “The winner will pull out the winning vote on Election Day.” Brilliant. A friend of mine sent me an email after reading that story online (at their awful web site) and said: “I cannot believe an adult wrote this. It is pathetic writing. It reminds me of some of the worst writing I saw as a teacher.”
Very few newspapers -- and none with any integrity -- allow advertising on the front page, yet the Times front is mostly advertisements. In fact, look at this week’s paper. There is one story and one photo among 12 ads. That’s outrageous. A quick measurement shows that 79% of the space below the nameplate is advertising. Where’s the beef? At least the old Times -- backwards though it was -- filled the pages with stories. This week the Times has three full pages and three half pages covered with photographs -- mostly static shots of people standing still.
The most frustrating part of this is that the Times is easily the worst of the 10 weeklies that the Independent Newspaper Group owns. Check out the Revere Journal, the Chelsea Record, the Charlestown Patriot Bridge or any of their other newspapers. They could put out a better product for the people of East Boston, but they consciously choose not to.